Begin typing your search above and press return to search.

Jayalalithaa Properties List

By:  Tupaki Desk   |   7 Dec 2016 9:17 AM GMT
Jayalalithaa Properties List
X
Post the demise of Jayalalithaa, Sasikala Natarajan took over the reins of AIADMK and O Panneerselvam got promoted as chief minister of Tamil Nadu. Now, Doubts were raised on the legal heir of properties owned by Amma.

As per experts, Jayalalithaa didn't inherit the properties of any of her family members and she has come to this stage all by herself. So, The assets of her will be distributed as per her wish. If she doesn't mention any of the names in her 'will', Then family members could inherit them or state government have the powers to recover them.

In her election affidavit while contesting from RK Nagar Assembly Constituency in June 2015, Jayalalithaa declared Rs 117.13 crore of net worth.

Jaya bought Poes Garden residence 'Veda Vilas' which was bought for Rs 1.37 lakh in 1967 is worth Rs 43.96 crore now. Her Close Aide Sasikala is likely to be the legal heir of this property.

Other Properties list...

14.5 acres of Agricultural land in Jeedimetla village in Ranga Reddy, Hyderabad. She purchased this property in 1968.

3.43 acres of Agricultural Land in Kanchipuram, Tamil Nadu. She bought it in 1981.

Four Commercial Complexes.

One of these properties is being offered to Sasikala's nephew Sudhakaran.

Cars: Two Tayota Prado SUVs, Tempo Travellor, Mahindra Jeep, Ambassador, Mahindra Bolero, Swaraj Max and Contenssa. The cost of these nine vehicles is up to Rs 42.45 lakhs.

Jewellery: 21280.300 grams of gold jewellery. Currently, They are with Karnataka Government Treasury due to the illegal assets case pending in Supreme Court. She have 1,250 kg of silver and its worth Rs 3,12,50,000.

When she contested from RK Nagar constituency in 2016 Assembly polls, Jayalalithaa declared in election affidavit that she have Rs 41.63 crore movable assets and Rs 72.09 crore of immovable assets.

Shares worth Rs 27.44 crore in five companies have been in the custody of court because of the disproportionate assets case.