Begin typing your search above and press return to search.

Justice for Journalists: FIR Canceled, Supreme Court Stands Firm!

The court granted interim protection, ensuring no coercive action would be taken against him while the matter is under consideration.

By:  Tupaki Desk   |   5 Oct 2024 4:00 AM GMT
Justice for Journalists: FIR Canceled, Supreme Court Stands Firm!
X

The Supreme Court of India has recently asserted that filing criminal cases against journalists for publishing critical articles about the government is inappropriate and constitutes a violation of freedom of expression. This declaration came during the hearing of a petition filed by journalist Abhishek Upadhyay, who sought to quash an FIR registered against him in Uttar Pradesh. The court granted interim protection, ensuring no coercive action would be taken against him while the matter is under consideration.

Abhishek Upadhyay had written an article discussing caste dynamics within government administration, which led to multiple FIRs being filed against him by various police departments in Uttar Pradesh. His petition highlighted the need for safeguarding journalistic freedom, particularly in a democratic society where Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution protects the rights of journalists. The bench, comprising Justice Hrishikesh Roy and Justice SVN Bhatti, emphasized that criticism of government actions should not be met with criminal charges, reinforcing the importance of free speech.

During the proceedings, the Supreme Court underscored that freedom of expression is a fundamental right that must be upheld in democratic nations. The justices pointed out that criminalizing journalistic criticism could have a chilling effect on free speech, deterring journalists from holding those in power accountable. In its order, the court issued notices to the Uttar Pradesh government regarding the FIRs against Upadhyay and scheduled the next hearing for November 5.

This ruling is significant not only for Upadhyay but also for journalists across India, as it sets a precedent for protecting press freedom. The Supreme Court's stance reinforces the idea that robust debate and criticism are essential components of a healthy democracy. As this case progresses, it will be closely watched by media professionals and civil rights advocates who are concerned about the ongoing challenges to freedom of expression in India.