Begin typing your search above and press return to search.

Raju's Warning: 60 Days of Absence Could Trigger a By-Election for Jagan

Raju criticized Jagan Mohan Reddy for not submitting any leave requests to date. He warned that a failure to attend the assembly for a continuous period of sixty days would definitely lead to a by-election in Pulivendula.

By:  Tupaki Desk   |   4 Feb 2025 4:58 AM GMT
Rajus Warning: 60 Days of Absence Could Trigger a By-Election for Jagan
X

In a striking statement, AP Deputy Speaker Raghurama Krishnam Raju announced the potential for a by-election in Pulivendula, represented by YSRCP leader and former Chief Minister Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy. This assertion hinges on the condition that if Reddy fails to attend the assembly for sixty consecutive days without submitting a leave request, his membership could automatically be revoked. During a meeting with the media in the nation's capital, Delhi, Raju made these remarks, which have since sparked widespread discussion.

Raju further clarified that, despite Jagan Mohan Reddy currently involved in legal proceedings seeking the opposition status, this legal battle has no bearing on the potential disqualification from his assembly membership. He emphasized that any assembly member must provide justified reasons for their absence to avoid facing consequences. Additionally, he underscored the principle that the responsibility of granting opposition status lies with the electorate rather than the Speaker, stating, "One could simply sign in and leave the assembly to maintain their seat."

Raju criticized Jagan Mohan Reddy for not submitting any leave requests to date. He warned that a failure to attend the assembly for a continuous period of sixty days would definitely lead to a by-election in Pulivendula. These comments reflect the seriousness with which the Deputy Speaker views the obligations of assembly members towards their duties and the legislative process.

Furthermore, Raju questioned the absence of action against Chandrababu Naidu, the leader of the previous government, who also did not attend assembly sessions for an extended period. This raises questions about the consistency and fairness of applying rules governing assembly attendance and participation.

The Deputy Speaker's comments also touched on the broader implications of hastily enacted decisions without considering the established legal and procedural framework. He warned against dragging the law into politics for short-term gains, highlighting the potential damage to the government's image and the importance of thoughtful decision-making that respects the spirit and purpose of the law.

In conclusion, Raju's statements have ignited a debate on the responsibilities of elected officials, the enforcement of assembly rules, and the broader implications for democratic accountability. His call for adherence to procedural norms and legal frameworks underscores the importance of maintaining integrity and discipline within the legislative process.