Passing objectionable comments against the judiciary and the judges has become a big issue in Andhra Pradesh. While the court is trying to stop the trend by getting those who pass objectionable comments arrested, the party leaders are assing commnets. Forget about others, even the Chief Minister made comments on the Judiciary.
When the High Court of Andhra Pradesh ordered the government to develop Amaravati as the capital city, many legislators from the ruling YSRCP including YS Jagan Mohan Reddy said that the courts are behaving outside its limits. Probably, this is the first time a Chief Minister made comments against the judiciary.
Now an employee leader also made comments against the judiciary. Not happy with the Judges alleging trying to interfere in state matters, he asked if the Chief Minister has no self-respect as the judges do.
AP Secretariat Employees Association President Venkata Rami Reddy, who is an evident supporter of the YSRCP took strong objection to judges interfering in administrative issues of the state.
Now his pro-YCP ideology landed him in big trouble as a petition was filed with the High Court of Andhra Pradesh against him. A senior advocate filed the petition seeking directives to remove him from the post.
The advocate found fault with the comments made by the employees chief. The advocate asked how come a government employee pass objectionable comments against the judiciary. He even wondered why the government is tight-lipped on the controversy.
Saying that the Andhra Pradesh government would have taken an action against AP Secretariat Employees Association President Venkata Rami Reddy for his comments, the advocate asked why the government did not tackle any action.
Mixing personal and professional things always leads to disaster. Andhra Pradesh Secretariat Employeesâ Association Kakarla Venkatrami Reddy has a big responsibility to look into the issues faced by the employees. However, rather than raising his voice against the government on employee issues Vankatrami Reddy always speaks highly about the state government.
The pro-YSRCP ideology made him face a petition. We have to wait and see what the Andhra Pradesh High Court will say after hearing the petition filed by an advocate.
When the High Court of Andhra Pradesh ordered the government to develop Amaravati as the capital city, many legislators from the ruling YSRCP including YS Jagan Mohan Reddy said that the courts are behaving outside its limits. Probably, this is the first time a Chief Minister made comments against the judiciary.
Now an employee leader also made comments against the judiciary. Not happy with the Judges alleging trying to interfere in state matters, he asked if the Chief Minister has no self-respect as the judges do.
AP Secretariat Employees Association President Venkata Rami Reddy, who is an evident supporter of the YSRCP took strong objection to judges interfering in administrative issues of the state.
Now his pro-YCP ideology landed him in big trouble as a petition was filed with the High Court of Andhra Pradesh against him. A senior advocate filed the petition seeking directives to remove him from the post.
The advocate found fault with the comments made by the employees chief. The advocate asked how come a government employee pass objectionable comments against the judiciary. He even wondered why the government is tight-lipped on the controversy.
Saying that the Andhra Pradesh government would have taken an action against AP Secretariat Employees Association President Venkata Rami Reddy for his comments, the advocate asked why the government did not tackle any action.
Mixing personal and professional things always leads to disaster. Andhra Pradesh Secretariat Employeesâ Association Kakarla Venkatrami Reddy has a big responsibility to look into the issues faced by the employees. However, rather than raising his voice against the government on employee issues Vankatrami Reddy always speaks highly about the state government.
The pro-YSRCP ideology made him face a petition. We have to wait and see what the Andhra Pradesh High Court will say after hearing the petition filed by an advocate.