Jana Sena chief Pawan Kalyan's Tuesday speech, where he used abusive words galore, is the talk of the town. While some are slamming him for crossing the Lakshman Rekha of comments, the others are supporting him for what he said and argued that the YSRCP deserves these invectives. But, Pawan's invective-filled speech avoided comments against two YSRCP politicians.
Pawan himself said this. He said all the YSRCP MLAs, except Balineni Srinivas Reddy and Anam Ramnarayana Reddy, were indecent and abusive. He said his criticism does not apply to these two leaders. Pawan himself explained as to why Anam and Balineni are different from the rest of the pack.
He said that Jana Sena official spokesperson Rayapati Arnuna had some time ago received abusive calls from a purported YSRCP supporter. Thinking that Balineni was behind all this, Aruna criticized Balineni, to which Balineni responded by slapping a defamation case against Aruna. Later, it came to light that Balineni was in no way involved. Then Pawan personally called up Balineni and requested him to withdraw cases. A magnanimous Balineni withdrew the cases, he said.
Pawan also said that Anam Ramnarayan Reddy was a straightforward person who liked to call spade a spade. He would not baulk at criticizing even the ruling party if there was something wrong. Hence, Pawan said that his criticism does not apply to these two leaders. Now, why Pawan specifically mentioned these names? Is something cooking?
Note: Your feedback is very important to us. Post them in the comments box down below. Be sure to give us your opinion no matter what. Please do not use abusive language. There are better ways to speak your mind.
Pawan himself said this. He said all the YSRCP MLAs, except Balineni Srinivas Reddy and Anam Ramnarayana Reddy, were indecent and abusive. He said his criticism does not apply to these two leaders. Pawan himself explained as to why Anam and Balineni are different from the rest of the pack.
He said that Jana Sena official spokesperson Rayapati Arnuna had some time ago received abusive calls from a purported YSRCP supporter. Thinking that Balineni was behind all this, Aruna criticized Balineni, to which Balineni responded by slapping a defamation case against Aruna. Later, it came to light that Balineni was in no way involved. Then Pawan personally called up Balineni and requested him to withdraw cases. A magnanimous Balineni withdrew the cases, he said.
Pawan also said that Anam Ramnarayan Reddy was a straightforward person who liked to call spade a spade. He would not baulk at criticizing even the ruling party if there was something wrong. Hence, Pawan said that his criticism does not apply to these two leaders. Now, why Pawan specifically mentioned these names? Is something cooking?
Note: Your feedback is very important to us. Post them in the comments box down below. Be sure to give us your opinion no matter what. Please do not use abusive language. There are better ways to speak your mind.