Was Pawan Kalyan Minor During Praja Rajyam Merger?

As is the king, so are the people they say. How unstable the chief speaks and how unclearly the chief responds, the small leaders and activists behave the same way might be the meaning. Keeping this aside, it is said that a new debate came to light on Chiranjeevi's Praja Rajyam'a merger issue.

It is said that the comments made by a few and the clarification they gave, followed by the covering a few others gave became a hot topic not only in Janasena but also among the Mega fans. While those who heard the full version of the Janasena leaders' comments are responding in some way, those who came to a decision after hearing half version are firing at them.

No matter if the full version was heard or the full version was heard the reports which say the statements were made mentioning Chiranjeevi's name is true, which is crucial. It is also important that the conclusion they gave on Chiranjeevi is also their words. However, there are also a few who say that the conclusion is part of the damage control and an effort to stay stable.

"Though Chiranjeevi failed politically, Pawan Kalyan started a party bravely. Not at least one cadre from Praja Rajyam was asked to work with him. It would be speaking a word against Chiranjeevi to say more. But this is a tough situation. Chiranjeevi Garu paved the failure path for Pawan Kalyan," a few are believed to have said. This is the social media version.

What needs to be noted here is that a few observers say the comments might have been made with full clarity as they said it would be talking against Chiranjeevi. They are also stressing the point of a tough situation. A debate is also doing rounds on whether is it required to talk against Chiranjeevi to mention the current situation of Pawan even if they are sad that the public is not believing him.

Against this backdrop, a fantastic conclusion might have been given about Chiranjeevi and Pawan Kalyan. They might have expressed their liking towards them at a big level. But there is no need to mention Chiranjeevi Praja Rajyam's merger say many. Because Pawan Kalyan was not a minor or a small kid when Chiranjeevi merged Praja Rajyam into Congress.

Mega fans are reminding the issue online reportedly. They also say that there are no Pawan fans and Chiranjeevi fans differently, and there are Mega family fans. Others might forget this, but those who dub themselves as Janasena official spokespersons and come before the mic for the party should remember this. Chiranjeevi will not lose anything, they say.

They are also advising that it is not acceptable to make such comments without giving clarity on whether Pawan Kalyan, who was the Yuvarajyam President then raised any objections when Praja Rajyam was merged. Did he accept or took the issue lightly? Political observers say that if this is part of the political strategy, then the strategy is not right.

As we are living in the social media era and everyone shares their opinions with the world, there is a threat of hearing comments like," Even after ten years of floating the party, still the mention of Praja Rajyam is needed? " Observers say that there is a threat of a crack among the mega fans. There is a need for the Janasena leaders to think if Chiranjeevi has any loss with this.

Keeping aside the debate of whether the comments that are said to be made by the Janasena leaders are new ones or old ones, some comments became viral. So a few Mega fans are said to be making comments like: "Our hero has MLAs to merge, but your chief is not even an MLA", and "Why are you commenting our brother when you don't have the caliber to win the elections".

On top of this, Nagababu's response to the issue is also becoming viral. Reacting to the row on the comments made against Chiru, Nagababu reportedly said: Leave it, she made the comments in the flow. She is a woman leader who has been in the party since its inception, don't bother. With this, comments like it is ok if the comments are made in a flow, but it is a problem if they are made as part of political strategies are doing rounds.

Observers say that everyone should understand one thing here. What is the relation between Chiranjeevi merging his Prajya Rajyam then and Pawan supporting the Chandrababu-Modi duo and saying he will contest the elections with Chandrababu?

Observers say that no matter what the damage has been made. A few might have understood what would be the situation if they speak anything without thinking anything by giving a chance to opponents. The situation would be good if the other Janasena leaders learn from this. Or else damage will be done which cannot be controlled.