A woman who tied the knot with her husband with a lot of hope and expectations suffered a big shock after knowing the sexual orientation of her husband. He turned out to be gay. After knowing that she moved a court and the court ordered the person to pay compensation and maintenance.
But the person challenged the same in the higher court. But the court shocked him and supported the orders issued by the lower court and directed him to pay the fine and compensation. He was directed to pay a sum of Rs 1 lakh and an amount of Rs 15,000 every month.'
Going into details, a couple from Mumbai tied the knot in 2016. Despite tying the knot the marriage was not consummated. The husband did not reciprocate the actions of his wife. This made the victim grow suspicious of him.
Later it was found that the husband who holds a government job is gay and his wife reportedly found nude pictures of him with other men. With the same evidence he moved the court and the court ordered a compensation of Rs. 1 lakh as he hid the details about his sexual orientation.
He was also directed to pay Rs 15,000 every month for her maintenance. However, he challenged the court in an upper court. Having been satisfied with the evidence and the arguments, the upper court supported the orders issued by the lower court.
But the person challenged the same in the higher court. But the court shocked him and supported the orders issued by the lower court and directed him to pay the fine and compensation. He was directed to pay a sum of Rs 1 lakh and an amount of Rs 15,000 every month.'
Going into details, a couple from Mumbai tied the knot in 2016. Despite tying the knot the marriage was not consummated. The husband did not reciprocate the actions of his wife. This made the victim grow suspicious of him.
Later it was found that the husband who holds a government job is gay and his wife reportedly found nude pictures of him with other men. With the same evidence he moved the court and the court ordered a compensation of Rs. 1 lakh as he hid the details about his sexual orientation.
He was also directed to pay Rs 15,000 every month for her maintenance. However, he challenged the court in an upper court. Having been satisfied with the evidence and the arguments, the upper court supported the orders issued by the lower court.