Delhi HC: False Promise of Marriage Not a Legal Defense

In a recent ruling by the Delhi High Court, Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma made it clear that a man's false promise of marriage cannot be used as a shield from legal consequences. The case in question involved a plea to quash a rape charge against a man who is accused of deceiving a woman by engaging in a physical relationship under the guise of a future marriage, only to later renege on his promise. This decision was made amidst discussions on the responsibilities and expectations placed on women within the judicial system, particularly in cases involving promises of marriage.

The judge dismissed the notion that the woman, being older and presumably more experienced, should have foreseen the potential for such difficulties in the relationship. Such an argument, the court noted, stems from a deeply ingrained patriarchal and misogynistic mindset. Instead, the focus was placed on the accused's actions and the allegations against him. Justice Sharma emphasized that allowing the case to be dismissed without a thorough trial would undermine the severity of the accusations and the need for a comprehensive legal examination.

The man, who was a colleague of the woman, initially established a friendship with her before progressing to a romantic relationship, underpinned by a promise of marriage. Over the course of three years, from 2018 to 2021, he dissuaded her from considering other marriage prospects and maintained a physical and financial relationship with her, benefiting from her financially. When he eventually reneged on his promise to marry and refused to return the money she had given him, she took legal action against him. The court refuted the defense's argument that the physical relationship was mutual and consensual, highlighting the exploitation and deception involved.

This ruling underscores the court's refusal to uphold arguments that shift the burden of predicting and preventing marriage-related problems onto women. It reaffirms the judiciary's commitment to addressing and rectifying instances of deceit and manipulation, especially in cases where false promises are used to exploit individuals. The insistence on a full trial reflects the legal system's dedication to thoroughly investigating such serious allegations, ensuring justice is served based on the merits of the case rather than outdated societal norms.